29 Apr 2002
A Joint Discplinary Scheme statement published today said: 'As the Appeal Tribunal said of them, the belief that Mr Leeson's trading activities "posed little (or no) risk to the Barings Group, but yielded very good returns, is implausible and in our view, demonstrates a degree of ignorance of market reality that totally lacks credibility."'
Complaints against Coopers audit engagement partner Andrew Charles Turner were however dismissed. And the original fine against Coopers was reduced by the appeal tribunal from £1m to £250,000. A fine against Gareth Maldwyn Davies, also a Coopers partner, was reduced from £65,000 to £25,000.
Barings bank collapsed in 1995 amid unauthorised transactions in excess of £800m by rogue trader Nick Leeson.
A statement issued by the PricewaterhouseCoopers said: 'We are disappointed by the tribunal findings. We feel it is important to reemphasise that the Barings collapse was due to fraud and management failure in which Coopers & Lybrand played no part.'The appeal tribunal has confirmed that Coopers & Lybrand could not have prevented the collapse of Barings and that the firm carried out much skilled and detailed work to a high standard.'
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment