aop
ad

Cattles scandal takes new twist with £850m writedown

by David Jetuah

More from this author

01 Apr 2009

Cattles, the troubled sub-prime lending company has announced it will have to put aside an additional £850m to cover customers defaulting on debts.

The company believes a 'breakdown in internal controls' at its Welcome Financial Services arm meant its impairment policies had been applied incorrectly, leading to the underprovisioning for bad debtors.

Six senior executives of the group, including group FD James Corr and divisional FD Peter Miller remain suspended pending the final outcome of a probe by internal auditors Deloitte and law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.

Jamie Smith, a former Deloitte transaction and reorganisation services partner, will be parachuted in as interim FD, subject to approval from the Financial Services Authority.

Cattles said in a statement today: 'The Deloitte report estimates that the group will need to make a provision of around £700m in excess of that originally anticipated with respect to the value of customer loans held as at 31 December, 2008.

'The Board is also considering whether to include an additional Incurred But Not Reported provision consistent with accounting standard IAS39.

'Based on work carried out to date, the Board believes that the adoption of such a policy would result in an IBNR impairment provision of approximately £150m with respect to the value of customer loans held as at 31 December, 2008.'

In order for the breakdown in internal controls to have occurred, Cattles said, and for the extent of underprovisioning to have remained unrecognised (despite specific and repeated questioning by members of the board as part of its monitoring of the group's credit risk position) the board believed that it had received inaccurate and/or incomplete information.

The release of Cattles annual report has been shelved until its issues have been resolved.

Cattles expects to report a significant loss before tax for the year ended 31 December, 2008 and in the requirement to restate the Group's financial statements for the year ended 31 December, 2007, it said.

'It is possible that such a restatement of the 2007 financial statements could result in a significant reduction in previously reported profit before tax for that year. The impact on the Group's financial statements for earlier years is still being considered.'

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Digg
  • Tweet

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities