aop
ad

CIoT lobby win for HMRC 'equitable liability' extension

by David Jetuah

More from this author

17 Nov 2009

A measure which stops HMRC pursuing tax cases where it is thought excessive and unfair to do so has been retained after pressure from tax experts.

The "equitable liability" practice applies in cases where, although money is technically due, a taxpayer has missed the deadline for appealing against an HMRC estimate of their tax liability.

On the grounds of a misunderstanding about procedures, the taxpayer is allowed to argue that the true amount of tax which should be payable is less.

HM Revenue and Customs has traditionally held the option, but a review in 2008 put the measure under threat of being abolished from April 2010.

But following strong representations from the CIoT, led by the Institute’s President, Andrew Hubbard, and others, the government have told the CIoT they will be legislating "at the earliest opportunity" to retain the practice.

"The Chartered Institute of Taxation has expressed delight at the news that its campaign to retain the 'equitable liability' practice has been successful," the body said.

"Often it is the most vulnerable taxpayers who have benefited from HMRC’s exercise of discretion in these cases."

Andrew Hubbard said: "This is very good news indeed. The most vulnerable in society need protection when things have gone badly wrong, even when they themselves may have caused the problems by their own action – or more often inaction – and the equitable liability practice was an important safety valve of last resort.

"So I am delighted to have received confirmation directly from the Minister that a decision has been taken to introduce legislation to put this on a proper, permanent footing."

Visitor comments Add your comment

Don't count your chickens before

Greeks bearing gifts are great welcome. But until unrapped what have we got?

Equitable Liability is a principle right in cases of "unjust enrichment" from the Revenue.

The Government never consulted in accordance with its own "consultation policy".

Before changes are made on this perhaps, this time there will be effective consultation. First.

Sharp changes in tax are unneceessary and can destroy business e.g. furnished holiday lettings and end cheaper "Holidays for All"

Posted by: Joe Hannigan, 17 Nov 2009 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities