18 Jan 2005
The Brussels-based Comit‚ Europ‚en des Assurances (CEA) claimed the IASB had been pressured by banking regulators, and that its industry would suffer as a result.
It said in a statement: 'Most European insurers make frequent use of this option for both financial assets and liabilities as a tool for providing more relevant information and simplifying the processes. They have been preparing for IAS39 in the version including the unlimited fair value option. Such a fundamental U-turn would pose major changeover difficulties.'
CEA president G‚rard de La MartiniŠre said his officials would try to begin talks with EU banking regulators to better understand their concerns about fair value accounting 'and assess the best way to deal with them'.
One possible solution, he said, would be to use 'general accounting standards rather than supervisory tools' to ease banking fears.
The row comes as rules insisting EU listed companies use IAS are bedding in, having come into force on January 1. As a result, De La MartiniŠre said it was of 'critical importance to have a revised IAS39 in place... as soon as possible'.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment