28 Jun 2004
It suggested the idea at a conference it organised in Brussels. OLAF asked the 150 delegates to develop a system exchanging 'information about detected fraudulent misappropriation of international aid funds'to 'help donors and investigators cross-check their information about recipients of international aid and verify doubts about their handling of funds...'
Such a system would resemble the USA General Accounting Office's FraudNET, which allows whistle-blowers to report allegations of fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement of federal government funds by e-mail, fax or post. Tipsters can remain anonymous and are encouraged to provide maximum detail about 'the who, when, where, what, how and how much'.
In a post-conference note OLAF said: 'The fight against fraudulent misappropriation of international aid funds is an enormous challenge. The mere falsification and multiple use of invoice or the intentional non-realisation of a subsidised project are only the most obvious examples.' More complex cases were highlighted by the conference, such as fictitious participation of organisations in a consortium to boost grant sizes.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment