27 Nov 2008
A director at a UK offshore tax haven has rejected speculation that a government review of Crown dependencies announced in the pre-Budget report earlier this week would scare off rich investors and threaten the future of offshore jurisdictions.
While details of the review have yet to be released by the Treasury, some experts believe the review will focus on pressuring havens to be more open and provide more financial information to organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to help combat money laundering and tax evasion.
The announcement of the review, which is due to be completed next spring, comes amid moves by European leaders and US President-Elect Barack Obama to crackdown on offshore tax havens.
But Robert Kirkby, technical director at Jersey Finance, said he was not worried by the review.
‘We regard the Treasury’s review simply as a health check. The announcement didn’t come as a huge surprise,’ he said.
He added that he was confident Jersey, a leading offshore financial centre, would demonstrate a ‘robust, regulatory regime’ that complied with international standards.
Kirkby said he was unaware of any deposit shifting in Jersey over the past couple of months as this is reported quarterly.
Richard Murphy, tax campaigner at the Tax Research Network, said investors would start withdrawing funds from some of the smaller offshore jurisdictions, such as Jersey and Guernsey.
Murphy a long-standing critic of tax havens — said Jersey and Guernsey’s heavy reliance on financial services and securitisation markets would lead to their closure.
John Thurso, Liberal Democrat MP for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, and a senior member of the Treasury Committee, said: ‘The consequences, particularly for the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands, are that we could destroy their economies and turn them into nothing more than benefit havens.’
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
Offshore Review
What planet has Robert Kirkby been inhabiting over the past months.
Barclays kindly "ratted me out" to the revenue, and I was on the phone to the CI.
about my accounts there.
The lady on the telephone admitted that they were inundated with similar calls and that people were shifting offshore funds out of Barclays, wholesale.
I am actually a genuine ex pat, and have had accounts for my overseas salaries in the CI for thirty years.
HMRC are now insisting that I produce evidence of my whereabouts and income for the past thirty years.
As a private individual, I understood that I am only required to keep records for 22 months. How can HMRC make this demand from me?
No accountant to date can answer this sismple question.
So Mr Kirkby, I have zeroed out my CI accounts and will burn any further funds before ever entrusting them to your
self serving, "offshore tax haven" again.
I advise everyone to do the same. The CI offshore banks are now a very bad joke and not fit for purpose.
Posted by: Mr T Dicker, 22 Dec 2008 | 00:00