aop
ad

Former head slams SFO direction

by Barbara Buchanan

01 May 2008

Richard Alderman, new SFO head
Richard Alderman, new SFO head

One of the most successful recent heads of the SFO has added her voice to concerns that the fraud office may be forsaking the big company cases it is noted for.

Ros Wright, director of the SFO from 1996 to 2003, is the latest figure to add her concerns about the new SFO head Richard Alderman’s comments that he was interested in consumer frauds.

‘To say he is going to consider consumer fraud is not what the SFO is there for as there are other organisations such as the Office of Fair Trading and trading standards set up to do this,’ she said.

Wright added that the newly created fraud prosecution service, part of the Crown Prosecution Service, was there to tackle mid-sized fraud cases: ‘The BAE Systems case is the sort of case they should be doing.’

Referring to the row over the pursuit of the BAE case, she said: ‘The director should have been completely independent and not been susceptible to political interference and this applies to any investigation.’

Chris Dickson, a former lawyer with the SFO at the time of the BCCI investigation, said: ‘If the SFO is not going to concentrate on the big cases, there’s no-one else who can.’

SFO spokesman Sam Jaffa denied the organisation was changing direction.

‘There’s no let up in investigations involving big ticket corporate cases. The SFO is interested in victims of both individuals and corporate organisations,’ he said.

He added that the SFO has increased its education programme to inform consumers and corporate leaders about the best ways of reducing and preventing fraud.

Visitor comments Add your comment

The SFO and consumer Fraud

Given I can speak from personal experience, where the SFO have WASTED about £50 million of Public money "investigating" a complex fraud case, with little to show for it , leaving the victims of the fraud carrying the burden of over $200million of stolen funds / debts, collectively - it is plain to see that Richard Alderman is indeed right, that much much more focus should be given to restitution. If the SFO had done a half way competent job, of investigating the actual OPERATION of the int'l fraud, instead of just gathering multiple 'witness statements' which merely confirmed people's losses (which were of not much use either), then the creditors might have had their money back by now. the SFO urgently needs to wake its ideas up, and stop squandering Public money, mindlessly. they are all in their 'comfort' zones.

Posted by: Liz Watson, 02 May 2008 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities