08 Jan 2008
The true cost of MP's pensions is double the estimate used in Commons' accounts, which could hit their effort for a big pay rise.
A footnote in the accounts gives a figure for its MPs' pensions costs based on accounting standard FRS 17, which creates a value double that used in the main body of the accounts due to taking a less optimistic approach to the performance of the stock markets.
Under FRS 17 the Treasury would have to contribute £16.5m a year to meet its liabilities, compared to the £7.8m figure in the main body.
Pensions consultant John Ralfe argued that the figure used in the main body of the accounts was out of date and would massively understate the true value of the pension scheme, reported the FT.
The cost of an MP's salary is 38% its value under FRS 17, compared to 18.1% used in the main body of the accounts.
'This means the Treasury are not putting enough cash each year to pay for new pension promises, let alone pay down the deficit,' said Ralfe.
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment