17 Oct 2002
Link: The Enron saga
The punishment was the maximum allowed under law. Lawyers for the firm have said they will appeal the ruling.
The order against Arthur Andersen LLP handed down by federal prosecutors means the firm faces more fines and extended probation if the firm violates terms handed down by US District Judge Melinda Harmon.
The firm is now just a shell of its former self, with just 1,000 of its original 28,000 staff remaining on the payroll. It has also ceased to perform any audit work in the US, after having its auditing license withdrawn earlier this year. The majority of its global network of firms has been sold off to former Big Five rivals, now known as the Big Four.
Andersen was accused of shredding Enron-related documents last year to thwart a US Securities & Exchange Commission accounting probe. The nail in the coffin for Andersen came in May when former lead auditor, David Duncan, who headed up the Enron audit in Houston, admitted that documents relating to the energy company had been shredded.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment