aop
ad

Creditors pay more for company rescues

by David Jetuah

More from this author

31 Jul 2008

Insolvency practitioners are making more money as jittery creditors pay out more cash in an effort to keep companies afloat or recover their investment in failed companies.

IPs are benefiting because high demand for vital business advice has led to discount rates agreed with clients being lower than normal.

Leading IPs made clear that they were not holding companies to ransom, creditors were just willing to pay more in order to get the best outcomes as market conditions worsened.

‘Sometimes we have to discount our rates,’ said Lee Manning, business restructuring partner at Deloitte, ‘but we are recovering a higher proportion of our headline rates now.

‘In good economic conditions, IPs were a bit of a dying breed, but it’s all about insolvency at the moment. People like to have the key skills that we can bring.’

Nick O’Reilly, president of business recovery trade association R3, agreed, reporting IPs were finding themselves in higher demand for business restructuring, administrations and company break-ups.

In the past few months, some firms have been boosting their insolvency offering as more companies find themselves in financial straits and corporate finance divisions continue to struggle in the downturn.

Manning said that Deloitte was ‘well placed’ to cope with the extra demand for IPs if, as predicted, more businesses fall victim to the tough conditions.

As the supply of prospective buyers dries up as banks rein in their lending, Manning also predicted that there would be a spike in pre-package administrations, where a business secures a buyer before it enters insolvency.

‘It’s almost impossible to go to a lender for finance,’ said Manning. ‘Banks are running scared. There will be a drive for pre-packs.’

Visitor comments Add your comment

Sharp Practice

Surely a pre-packaged sale means that the company has been trading insolvently for some time with the knowledge and consent of its bank. The insolvency practioners are complicit in this and should be held to account as shadow directors along with other interested parties such as the bank instructing them. Why should the shareholders and unsecured creditors loose out? But the fees make up for it!!

Posted by: Finian Manson, 09 Sep 2008 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities