aop
ad

Bankers sweat over sub-prime accounting

by Nicholas Neveling

20 Sep 2007

Bank of England

Banks across the world were fretting over the accounting for complex derivatives this week, as US banks sought to draw a line under the crisis of confidence in the markets.

As UK regulators struggled to deal with a run on the bank at Northern Rock in the UK, US banks were reporting third-quarter numbers including new estimates of the value
of complex sub-prime mortgage related instruments.

The market for such instruments has collapsed, meaning banks can no longer ‘mark-to-market’ and will have to construct complicated models in order to report under mark-to-model valuations. But such models are controversial, after being abused by Enron.

A senior member of the profession warned banks: ‘The market is what it is, and people who try and build their wishes and dreams into valuation models will find that that is not consistent with the accounting rules.’

A Big Four partner told Accountancy Age that the crisis compared with the dotcom crash and the Russian default of 1998. Paul Sater, financial services partner at Ernst & Young, said: ‘We’ve experienced similar market conditions before: the 1994 bond crash, Mexico in 1995, Asia in 1997, Russia and Long Term Capital Management in 1998, the internet bubble - all these were huge challenges too. In times like this the audit of valuations requires significant application of auditors’ judgment. There is no silver bullet.’

Lehman Brothers took a $700m (£350m) writedown on its share of the complex instruments on Tuesday, with Morgan Stanley due to report yesterday and Goldman Sachs and Bear Stearns today.

Fears over possible losses from the complex derivatives instruments have crippled banking systems across the world, as banks grow concerned about lending to each other. The US third-quarter numbers are crucial in assessing how bad the issues are.
Although the world stock markets began falling in July, Sater suggested that banks had already been working on the accounting models for the previous two quarters, after initial concerns over sub-prime problems crystallised in February.

Visitor comments Add your comment

Auditing Sub-prime security

There is no good reason why normal audit procedures should not apply. Check several typical bundles, grading individual securities from 100% chance of being repaid to 0%.

Ascertain if the resulting proportionate split applies to selected other bundles. If so, apply to the whole collection of bundles.

If not, the process must be repeated on further bundles until consistency does occur (however long it takes and charging accordingly. Banks have only themselves to blame for the sub-prime mess).

Furthermore, bundling securities and trading them on constitutes fraud, if done in the knowledge (or not checking or not alerting the buyer) that the resulting overall package provides less 'cover' than the value of the loan(s) being secured (hence presumably the FBI investigation).

If auditors don't do the job comprehensively enough, they become accessories to the fraud.

Shades of Enron stalk the profession once more.

Posted by: Brian Warnes, 30 Jan 2008 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities