|
|
07 Oct 2008
US tax blogs have pored over Sarah Palin's tax returns and decided: they're wrong.
The tax returns of vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin have sparked a frenzy of debate among tax academics, lawyers and bloggers over whether she and her husband still owe tax due to alleged errors.
Jack Bogdanski of Lewis & Clark and Bryan Camp of Texas Tech raised issues over her returns.
'The children's travel payments are clearly taxable income,' said Bogdanski on his blog.
The debate was sparked by tax lawyer Roger M Olsen backing aspects of her tax return.
Further reading:
You may also like
Search thousands of financial jobs:
Search thousands of financial jobs:
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
AccountancyAgeInsight is a frequently updated resource centre for finance professionals, offering a free and easy-to-use digital library of briefings, white papers and other information resources. 
Visitor comments Add your comment
Bogdanski "Tax Expert" Pushing
Bogdanski, the so called "Tax Expert", is one of the few nuts still pushing the Palin's fake pregnancy.
http://bojack.org/2008/12/sarah_palins_fake_pregnancy_be.html
I would think twice before accepting anything this left wing nut says.
Posted by: Jim Nance, 06 Dec 2008 | 00:00