aop
ad

Mazars chief: big firms will change

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

12 Mar 2009

Patrick de Cambourg, Mazars
Patrick de Cambourg, Mazars

The profession’s biggest firms will move away from the network model towards more integrated businesses ­ or very loose associations, according to Mazars president Patrick de Cambourg.

In an interview in this week’s Accountancy Age, he said that the level of accountability accounting networks can offer is ‘possibly not sufficient’ and that full integration would be the answer for some of them while others would operate within much looser associations.

‘The profession will move towards more integration for some players and move towards alliances for the rest,’ said de Cambourg.

BDO International, Deloitte and Grant Thornton are battling litigation aimed at establishing links between their umbrella network and individual firms.

Global firms operating under single branding then claiming that member firms are independent was a model that cannot continue, as ‘people are led to believe there’s more than that, so the profession has to think to consider the way forward for more accountability, transparency and possibly innovation’, said de Cambourg.

But he defended firms facing huge litigation claims, saying that the market cannot survive with fewer major players and limiting liability must remain an area of discussion between governments, stakeholders, auditors and their clients.

Visitor comments Add your comment

Benefits of association without the legal liabilities

The larger firms have long stressed the benefits of their close association with overseas 'member' firms. Equally the structures chosen for such associations were intended to ensure that if one was sued that the others would be insulated from legal liability. We have yet to see if that is the case.

The challenge going forwards will be whether firms operating under the same brand name are able to resist not just legal challenges but also the stigma that could follow if one of their member firms fails as a result of litigation. And then one has to ask whether operating under the same brand is better than having evidently separate member firms , operating under their own brands but belonging to the same association. The latter approach has always struck me as more transparent and sustainable.

Posted by: Mark Lee, 12 Mar 2009 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities