aop
ad

Bookbinder folds as HMRC rejects time-to-pay plea

by David Jetuah

More from this author

29 Oct 2009

HMRC

How long can HMRC keep holding its breath on waiting for postponed tax revenues to roll in with no respite in the demand to stagger or postpone tax payments?

The tide may be turning after insolvency experts at Leonard Curtis have flagged up the first reported case of a company going bust after HMRC rejected pleas for a time to-pay arrangement. Discussion among advisers has now centered on how many more will follow.

P&J UK Ltd, a small Stockport-based bookbinder went into administration “following its failure to secure a Time To Pay Arrangement Scheme with HMRC to reschedule the payment of corporate taxation”, Leonard Curtis said.

The irony will not be lost on many insolvency practitioners that the entire workforce of P&J was saved through a pre-pack administration process.

Although P&J is a modest company with just 33 staff, the wider implications become clear because it is one of 4.7 million SMEs in the UK at the mercy of the recession.

The situation reinforces the fact that HMRC, although willing to help companies with a viable business plan, is not prepared to bail out all companies unconditionally.

"Whilst we are trying to be as helpful as possible to businesses, HMRC has a responsibility to the wider taxpayer base to ensure that we only give time to pay where there is a reasonable prospect that by doing so the business will be able to eventually meet their liabilities," HMRC said.

After allowing £3.87bn of deferred payments, as of 25 October, HMRC has confirmed: “90% of what we expected to have received has been paid back.”

£2.81bn of deferred payments has been repaid which means there is a £300m shortfall.

There is increasing speculation that the arrangements are delaying the inevitable, leaving the taxman to write off the ultimate amount of revenue when companies go bust further down the line.

But this is a claim the taxman refutes.

"There is currently some adverse press coming from insolvency practitioners about HMRC allowing huge debts to build up that will never be settled.

"The debt is not building up- the recovery rate on monies due and paid on time has consistently been between 90 and 94%," a spokeswoman said.

But with the busy run ­up to Christmas, businesses are under even more strain as they try to balance their working capital affairs with doing enough business to avoid insolvency.

VAT, PAYE and NI contributions add to the pressures and the Business Payments Support Service is sure to remain busy. However, HMRC is standing by its promise of keeping the service going for as long as it is needed.

"HMRC has always taken a sympathetic approach to businesses that have genuine short term difficulties in paying the tax they owe. In such cases, they can ask the BPSS for a revised timetable (a time to pay arrangement) to pay what they owe," the tax collector said.

"This can avoid HMRC taking action that would lead to an otherwise viable being declared insolvent by the courts."

The crux of the issue rests on the viability of the underlying business but it also raises concerns of how many of those companies HMRC has extended the olive branch to will survive in the long run.

HMRC said it is "acutely aware of the pressures people face when they are in financial difficulty – especially in the present situation," taking a " sympathetic approach to businesses that have temporary difficulties in paying the tax they owe."

The taxman stressed its aim was not to wind up companies or make individuals bankrupt, but to collect, as efficiently as possible the debts that are due.

"HMRC only initiates winding up or bankruptcy action where it believes this is the best course of action to protect the interests of the Exchequer in respect of a particular debt."

On the issue of repeat deferrals HMRC said it would aim to come to an arrange ment with the business concerned to give extra time to pay if it was needed and to avoid taking action that would lead to an otherwise viable business collapsing.

"HMRC’s experience is that this approach provides a better long term return to the Exchequer than – for example – forcing insolvency."

The taxman also explained it was minimising risk by ensuring larger requests were referred to its debt specialists for scrutiny before being agreed.

"These specialists review the payment history of cases to pick up any where this looks unsatisfactory. HMRC is closely monitoring trends and carrying out random compliance risk sampling. The service is aimed at all businesses (small and large).

"All requests for time to pay are considered by HMRC on a case by case basis. "

MORE:

6,000 time-to-pay please rejected

Visitor comments Add your comment

display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities