aop
ad

Details of Leeds sale awaited by observers

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

18 Jul 2007

Ken Bates’ Leeds United purchasing vehicle and former administrators from KPMG have come over all shy about the deal struck to give Bates back control of the football club.

The controversial sale, which was completed last week, has been shrouded in secrecy and riled the Football League, which insisted that more sale details be revealed to the body before it would let the club back into the League.

However, there is still the possibility that, in the medium term, details of the deal will not be released to the public or, much to their chagrin, rival bidders.

But the information will come out when KPMG has to pay out dividends to creditors from the assets of the sale, which could take six months.

Others close to events at the club suggest that the only reason Bates has kept the value quiet is that the offer would be deemed controversial. ‘Perhaps others would have paid more,’ said an accountant close to the matter.

Under insolvency law, KPMG did not necessarily have to accept the highest price, but the deal that represented the best value. ‘Having said that, with so much interest (in the club) I don’t know why it’s not been disclosed,’ the accountant added.

One of the sticking points for potential bidders was whether season tickets had been ‘ringfenced’. A second party close to bitter rival bidders said it had been difficult to factor receipt of the season tickets into bid offers, as there had been just a few days to put together a bid. ‘How could anyone else take comfort that the tickets would be collected?’ said a rival bidder.

Regarding the bid process and HMRC’s initial challenge, KPMG believes it has acted within the bounds of the law, operating in exceptional circumstances, a spokesman said.

It was ‘fairly unique’, he said, for KPMG to have an agreed CVA proposal challenged, and administrators from the firm had set a short deadline to receive bids to resolve the club’s future as soon as possible.

‘We wanted to allow bids, but the risk is that it protracts reaching a resolution and the way forward for the club,’ the spokesman said.

Visitor comments Add your comment

Which way forward?

Interesting choice for the 'way forward for the club' then: no league status, unpaid players, and back with a chairman who promises big investors that have yet to materialise.

Posted by: HIKPMG, 19 Jul 2007 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Digg
  • Tweet
    Information currently unavailable.
    Information currently unavailable.

No matching document

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities