24 Sep 2009
Finance directors could be hit with a “double whammy” of carbon payments that may put a squeeze on cashflow next year.
Government changes to the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) will force large UK companies to pay for their energy emissions twice in a year. This could see FDs struggling to raise capital for carbon, according to experts in the environmental business sector.
Companies that spend approximately £500,000 annually on energy bills must pay for carbon emissions every financial year.
Companies may be forced to pay for two years worth of emissions in one lump sum.
The government originally planned to make businesses pay for their emissions in 2010.
However, concerns over financial stability, in the wake of the recession led the UK government to defer payments by a year.
Tony Rooke, UK environmental programme manager at IT and business consultancy Logica, said: “The CRC is going to cost [businesses] close to 15% of their bill in [2011]…If you look at BT or some of the bigger supermarkets, their energy bills are in excess of £200m annually.
“Most companies don’t have huge amounts of cash in reserve – so are going to have to borrow it.”
Emma Wild, principal policy adviser on climate change for the CBI, said: “It is quite a significant payment in 2011 and we are concerned on the impact it could have.”
Russell McBurnie, finance director at Tenon, said that the government was not “going about the issue in the right way”.
He conceded that the government had taken into consideration the effects of the downturn on businesses by deferring payment for a year, but warned there was no guarantee “the economy will be much better in 2011”.
“The recession has come at a difficult time for the CRC to be launched,” said Logica’s Rooke.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
By making a few simple changes, direct Taxation from Westminster can be ignored.
If all employers and all employees, change the way they work and are paid, direct Taxation would not be possible to impose by HMRC.
You could then, quite legally, start an alternative system of Public Service Funding, based on the County Council structure. I have spoken to the District Council here in South Norfolk and I have met with Daniel Cox, Leader of the Norfolk CC. and the Local Authorities are very sympathetic to this idea.
Regards, ATFlynn,
"Norfolk's Mutineer"
Posted by: A T Flynn, 28 Sep 2009 | 00:00