|
|
06 Dec 2007
In an important test case, Richard Branson’s Virgin has lost against the Australian Tax Office (ATO) over its attempt to avoid a tax payment on $A90m worth of dividends from the investment of two of his companies in Australian budget airline Virgin Blue.
The High Court of Australia ruled that Virgin Blue was liable to pay tax on the dividends before sending the money to the Swiss-based Virgin Group companies, Cricket SA and Virgin Holdings SA, in December 2005.
ATO argued the payment of a $A72.5m (₤31.1m) dividend to Cricket and $20.8m to Virgin Holdings via round-robin transactions to related companies were just a ruse to avoid paying Australian tax.
The case is an important test of the Tax Office's ability to challenge complex corporate financial transactions, Sydney paper Sydney Morning Herald reports. The tax has been kept in a bank, earning interest while the outcome of Virgin’s appeal was pending.
Further reading:
You may also like
Search thousands of financial jobs:
Search thousands of financial jobs:
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
AccountancyAgeInsight is a frequently updated resource centre for finance professionals, offering a free and easy-to-use digital library of briefings, white papers and other information resources. 
Visitor comments Add your comment