Government's £850bn price banking tag

by Mario Christodoulou

More from this author

04 Dec 2009

  • Comments

The stratospheric level of taxpayer support handed out during the credit crunch was laid bear by the National Audit Office report which found an unprecedented £850bn was earmarked to prop-up the ailing financial sector.

Part share purchases, part guarantees along with insurance and loans, the report details the list of government support handed out during the past two years.

According to the report, government support included:
- £37 billion of shares in RBS and Lloyds Banking Group;
- a further £39 billion of shares in both banks;
- Bank of England indemnity against losses incurred in providing over £200 billion of liquidity support;
- guarantees of up to £250 billion of wholesale borrowing by banks;
- approximately £40 billion of loans and other funding to Bradford & Bingley and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme; and
- insurance cover of more than £600 billion of bank assets, reduced to just over £280 billion in November 2009.

The report also included a pointed criticism of the government’s failure to consult with parliament before committing the funds.

Edward Leigh MP, Chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, said the chancellor “transgressed” a long established principle.

"It has been an absolute constitutional principle for centuries that government does not spend money or issue indemnities without informing Parliament. That principle was transgressed when the Chancellor decided not use the established protocol of notifying the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee and the Chairman of the departmental select committee,” he said.

“The plea that the information was sensitive is irrelevant since disclosure to us could easily have been made in confidence, in line with customary practice. Trust in the discretion of the chairmen has never been misplaced in the past.

“I am greatly disturbed over this decision to play fast and loose with Parliamentary rules - and with the feeble explanation for doing so proffered by the Treasury.”

Further reading: Maintaining financial stability across the United Kingdom's banking system

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send

Charterhouse Accountants

Finance Officer

Charterhouse Accountants, Beaconsfield, Permanent, Full Time, £ Competitive




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.