27 Aug 2009
A Swansea-based firm has won £500 from the taxman after a struggling company had to wait months for a £15,000 refund.
H W Vaughan said it completed the relevant forms for the repayment last December, but then faced a series of delays in trying to secure the money.
'The query was passed between different HMRC employees and paperwork went missing on several occasions,' H W Vaughan said in a statement.
The client finally received the rebate last month, but not before H W Vaughan had paid for numerous additional letters and phone calls in addition to staff time.
H W Vaughan partner Russell Halliday then demanded a further £500 to cover the costs arising from the delay, which HMRC agreed to pay.
Halliday said: 'We kept being passed around departments, everyone was blaming everyone else, and some paperwork had to be sent three times – there’s simply no excuse for that kind of delay.'
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
HMRC in danger of breaching Fraud Act
Fraud Act 2006
Sec 2 Fraud by false representation
Sec 3 Fraud by failing to disclose information
Sec 4 Fraud by abuse of position
Would their behavior be regarded as dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people.
Are they aware that
their conduct was dishonest and would be regarded as dishonest by reasonable and honest people.
R v Ghosh [1982]
Q.B.1053.
Posted by: W L L Lambeth, 27 Aug 2009 | 00:00
HMRC in danger of breaching Fraud Act
Fraud Act 2006
Sec 2 Fraud by false representation
Sec 3 Fraud by failing to disclose information
Sec 4 Fraud by abuse of position
Would their behavior be regarded as dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people.
Are they aware that
their conduct was dishonest and would be regarded as dishonest by reasonable and honest people.
R v Ghosh [1982]
Q.B.1053.
Posted by: W L L Lambeth, 27 Aug 2009 | 00:00