14 May 2009
HMRC may be pressed to investigate the tax affairs of MPs and ministers believed to have ‘flipped’ addresses and then disclosed them as second homes to parliamentary authorities while telling the taxman they were their main addresses.
So far the taxman has been kept out of the storm over politicians’ expenses after specific oversight by the taxman was removed in 2003. But it is understood that this does not include capital gains tax.
The belief among many observers is that HMRC’s rules on what constitutes a second home for the purposes of CGT is much stricter than the definitions in use by the House of Commons authorities. Former Committee on Standards in Public Life chairman Sir Alistair Graham has questioned whether MPs’ expenses should be free of tax and the Taxpayers’ Alliance is expected to raise the issue with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Sir John Lyon.
An HMRC spokesman said: ‘We cannot discuss individuals’ tax affairs,’ but added that private residence relief ‘in general’ applies to only one residence at any one time and that strict rules apply to qualifying properties and those who benefit. He said: ‘There are no special capital gains tax rules covering MPs’ homes.’
One of the cases that raised eyebrows over ‘flipping’ was that of communities secretary Hazel Blears, who claimed expenses for three properties and hotel bills in one year, though not at the same time, according to reports in The Daily Telegraph.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
HMRC may probe MPs' expenses
What do they mean HMRC 'may' probe MPs' expenses. HMRC ought to investigate and go back several years with it as they do with individuals. Why should MPs be treated any different?
It's disgusting that it's taken this long and there ought to be prison sentences to those who have act 'fraudulently' - which is essentially what MPs have done!
MPs are now ducking out by resigning before it all comes out - this is a definite sign of guilt to me.
A new governement with expenses being audited by independent auditors every year and published to the public should be the next step for a new government.
MPs are parasites - all of them!
Posted by: London tax payer, 14 May 2009 | 00:00
MP's are Thieves
There was never any 'political will' , in a rising market, with unregulated borrowing, under Browns Expenses system to allow the price of an average house, to be affordable for a person earning average wage.
My own {Labour} MP was flipping houses, making over £200,000.00 in profits from 2000-2007.
As well as paying back CGT, Ministers should be forced to pay back all profits, gained from buying and selling houses using taxpayers money.
[Millions of us have been forced to rent, for a decade wasting tens of thousands, and not one politician represented our interests, because the expenses system turned them all into property speculators]
Complicated Thievery.
Posted by: Joe Public, 05 Nov 2009 | 00:00