25 Jun 2008
A lawyer specialising in money laundering and financial service regulation this week questioned the validity of the EU’s ‘white list’ of countries where money laundering controls are considered the same as EU member states.
Stephen Platt, BakerPlatt Group barrister and chairman, questioned why countries such as Russia, Argentina and Mexico could justifiably make the list and noted Australia and Canada, also on the list, were less than 25% compliant by the standards set by the Financial Action TaskForce (FATF) into money laundering controls, according to Tax-News.com.
Platt described as ‘bewildering’ that white list countries were regared as having a higher level of control of money laundering compared with leading offshore finance centres, including the British Crown Dependencies.
‘Having researched the background to some of the countries included, we question why countries that fall behind recognised international standards are on the list, whilst finance centres such as Jersey, the Bahamas and the Cayman are not,’ said Platt, who advises gand regulators on the implementation of effective regulatory and anti-money laundering rules.
Further reading:
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment