aop
ad

IFRS2 to hit company profits

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

11 Aug 2004

Link: IAS/IFRS special report

The charge is predicted to wipe an average 5.42% a year, or £68m, from the profits of the top 25 FTSE100 companies by 2007.

Drinks producer Diageo would be the worst-hit FTSE100 company if the standard was applied now, taking a 43% charge on its latest year profits of £76m, while BSkyB and Standard Chartered would also suffer huge dents to their profits.

The new standard will also prove troublesome for many FDs, such as ICAP's Jim Pettigrew. The study found the broker company would take a charge of more than £7.5m, or nearly 9%. It would also adversely affect the profitability of FTSE250 companies such as Trinity Mirror, P&O and EMI.

'IFRS2 is not merely another change to accounting standards,' said Halliwell principal consultant Jon Dymond. 'The charge will impact on profits, recruitment, retention, reward structures, performance management and relationships with shareholders.'

The report said the charge on profits could also lead to a dramatic effect on the 'shape' of executive remuneration practice in the future, as companies would need to consider their aims and to whom options should be granted.

But Ken Wild, Deloitte technical partner, suggested that although IFRS would have an impact on businesses and the investment community, education about the implications of IFRS2 would be key to allaying fees.

'I'll be surprised if the market changed its assessment of a company merely because it accounted for its share-based schemes in a particular way, when it is essentially presenting the same information in a different way,' said Wild.

'We get all these new standards, and it's like, 'the world is going to end', and it doesn't. I'm not underestimating their impact, but it's short-term and the markets see it through.'

Visitor comments Add your comment

This is stupid. These 'expenses' have ALWAYS been there.

I can't understand why people are panicing about a new accounting standard.

The economic reality hasn't changed. These transaction were there before the accounting standard came out.

Whether you report with IFRS2 applied or not, the underlying company performance is the same. Only the reporting has changed.

Also, it shouldn't take a study to reveal that there will be 'reductions in profits'.

Just reading the standard would've told you that. It aims to capture additional, previously unrecorded 'expenditure'.

Posted by: Andrew Thomas, 19 Mar 2006 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities