11 Sep 2008
The Senate's interventions into tax avoidance isn't the US congress's first intervention into the area.
In fact, it is politicians who have in some respects led the way on cracking down on unethical, and often illegal, behaviour by US tax accountants and wealthy Wall Street bankers.
The US Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has made it its favourite subject; its report in 2005 on the promotion of tax shelters by accountancy firms led to one of the darkest days in KPMG's history.
The report, and the hearings that led up to it, helped bring about the Department of Justice's investigation into the firm that nearly led to its downfall, and its paying a $456m fine.
A further report in 2006 delved into the issue again, uncovering some of the more aggressive elements of the US tax industry again.
Now Senators Norm Coleman and Carl Levin are at it again, angry about the avoidance of taxes on dividends from US companies.
This report may even have some UK institutions worried; though Levin and Coleman's primary target is the US investment banks who marketed the scheme, and the IRS for not acting, the recipients of the tax advantages were foreign owners of US stocks.
Some may be worried the powerful US politicians may be after them next.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment