11 Apr 2003
The Hansard procedure - a civil settlement offered by the Inland Revenue in the investigatory process - will no longer protect the taxpayer from criminal prosecution. Evidence gathered in a Hansard procedure will now be admissible in 'various hearings', meaning criminal prosecutions.
Alastair Kendrick, a director at Ernst & Young, warned taxpayers to be properly advised the moment they are contacted by the Special Compliance Office. 'Anything you say or offer the Revenue from the outset will be permissible in court. It is a major, major change,' he said.
A package of reforms to tackle tax fraud and avoidance was also unveiled, which the Revenue claims will 'deliver significant savings'. This includes an investment of £66m over the next three years, in order to raise £1.6bn for government coffers. A similar amount is expected to be raised each year by Customs.
A number of specific avoidance schemes were targeted, in a move the paymaster general Dawn Primarolo described as 'designed to modernise the way risks to revenue are assessed and managed by the Inland Revenue'.
Experts believe the Hansard change may be in contravention of European law.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment