17 Oct 2002
The move appeared to be the first apparent case of the Act's extra-territorial powers scaring off a foreign company.
Porsche had been invited to join the NYSE at the beginning of 2002, but in a statement made today, the company, which is already listed on German stock exchanges, said: 'The crucial factor in Porsche's decision was ultimately the law passed by the U.S. government this summer (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act").'
Porsche took issue with the new requirements for CEOs and finance directors to 'swear that every balance sheet is correct and, in the case of incorrect specifications, are personally liable for high financial penalties and even up to 20 years in prison'.
The company also claims the listing would not bring the company any benefits, and instead and would have resulted in 'considerable extra costs'.
Finance director Holger P. Harter said, in Germany, the deliberate falsification of balance sheets was 'already punished according to the relevant regulations in the Commercial Code and the Company Act'.
He added that any special treatment under Sarbanes-Oxley was both 'illogical' and 'irreconcilable' with current German law.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment