08 Jan 2009
The profession’s disciplinary body is still months away from ruling on Ernst & Young’s work as auditor of Equitable Life.
The tribunal of the Accountants’ Joint Disciplinary Scheme (JDS) finished hearing the case in November 2007, but the final report is not yet complete.
The case considered complaints brought against E&Y itself, a partner and a former partner at the firm, as well as a former director and a manager (both chartered accountants) at Equitable.
E&Y’s request for a judicial review was dismissed and plans for an appeal abandoned.
Equitable, whose near collapse left more than a million policyholders nursing an estimated loss of £4bn, is one of only two cases the JDS has left before it is dissolved. The case has cost it £800,000.
Its successor body, the Accountancy and Actuarial Discipline Board, has already won its first case against the firm McClure Watters for its audit of the Emerging Business Trust in Northern Ireland at the end of last year.
However, the AADB lost a case against PricewaterhouseCoopers in late 2007 over the audit of bus manufacturer Mayflower at a total cost of £1m.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment