International networks survey: the big chill

by Philip Smith

27 May 2010

  • Comments

It has been a difficult year for most of the international accountancy groups. Fee income has dropped for nearly half of the organisations featured in Accountancy Age’s international survey, including all of the Big Four firms. In total, the 30 largest international accountancy networks, alliances and associations saw their fee income fall by nearly 5% to $142bn (£100bn) this year compared to $150bn in 2009.

While part of this fall can be explained by exchange rate differences – the figures are quoted in dollars – it is clear that the groups have had a tough time.

Add to this the near constant fear of cross-border legal action and you can see why some senior executives in these organisations might have problems sleeping at night. The global recession has, in effect, created a double whammy for the groups – corporate cutbacks have hit revenues in areas such as tax and transactions, while corporate collapse has seen creditors that are out of pocket searching for those with the deepest pockets.

And we are not out of the woods yet. When asked about possible threats to the industry, a significant number of groups said they feared a double dip recession. So it is possible that, if such fears are realised, some groups won’t see a return to growth next year.

Looking at the very top of the table, all of the Big Four international networks saw fee income fall compared to last year’s results. Once again, PricewaterhouseCoopers tops the league, with fee income of $26.2bn, down 7% on last year’s total. But it was able to just keep its nose in front of second placed Deloitte, which delivered $26.1bn in revenues, down 5% on the previous year.

Ernst & Young remains in third place with some $21.4bn in fee income, down 7%, while KPMG, which saw an 11% fall, came fourth with $20.1bn, though the network is quick to point out that this was only a 2.6% fall in local currencies.

However, despite these results, the accountancy giants remain upbeat about future prospects.
PwC says: “There are now clear signs that the global economic recovery has started and is picking up speed.”

It points to a number of sectors where it sees potential for growth – healthcare, financial services and infrastructure – and certain service lines, such as sustainability, including corporate social and non-financial reporting, carbon markets and trading and environmental data management.

KPMG sees potential in emerging markets, saying: “Geographically, high-growth markets in Asia Pacific, particularly China, and Latin America continue to present some of the greatest opportunities, and we expect to see continued expansion of investment and M&A activity in these markets.”

But the network can see some critical challenges ahead. The first is having standards and procedures in place that ensure consistency and integrity wherever a global network’s firms operate. The second challenge is balancing long-term goals with short-term costs so that productivity gains are realised while also supporting longer-term business objectives. Finally, with increasingly global markets, it is a greater challenge than ever to have the right people and resources in the right places to meet the needs of clients and the business.

The picture is mixed for the next tier of groups, as indeed is the way in which they are organised. Five out of the next 10 groups actually saw fee income increase on last year’s figures. This includes 12th placed Leading Edge Alliance, which reported a 16% jump in fee income to $2.4bn. This association of independent firms counts UK firms Johnston Carmichael and HW Fisher among its members.

Seventh placed Geneva Group International reported 9% growth ($4bn) – its members include UK accountancy firm Citroen Wells, though it should be remembered that the group as a whole includes law firms as well as accountancy firms.

“Geneva Group International has a continuous and constant growth, despite the situation of the global economy,” says Michael Reiss von Filski, secretary gen eral of the group, who believes his members have picked up work by being more fleet of foot than some of their larger rivals.

“Now more than ever, customers are looking for excellent professional services at a reasonable and fair price. Entrepreneur-owned accounting firms are preferred by clients,” he says. “It seems that many managers without any entrepreneurial attitude have completely lost touch with reality and paved the way to the world’s largest financial crisis.”

RSM International (7th, $3.9bn), likewise, saw a boost in its fee income. Praxity (9th, $3.3bn), whose members include the global firm Mazars, saw fee income go up by just 1% ($3.2bn). However, it believes it will grow through the addition of firms covering countries where it is currently under-represented.

Like many of the other groups, Baker Tilly International (10th, $3.1bn) believes that Latin America and China will have an influence on its direction. “The Chinese accounting profession is undergoing a period of significant transition with the ambitious announcement by the ministry of finance of the creation of a Big 10 that includes the Big Four and six large domestic firms,” says Geoff Barnes, Baker Tilly’s chief executive.

“Such a dilution of power will give the mid-tier networks more access to companies in the world’s third largest economy in nominal GDP terms.”

But, like so many of the international groups, Baker Tilly sees legal action as a constant headache.
“The threat of network-wide vicarious liability litigation as a result of the grey areas in the definition of ‘network’ is always a concern,” Barnes says. “However, all networks understand generally that the onus of liability arises from actions implying control over member firms. This is a known parameter within which we must work and remain vigilant for members who misunderstand the implications of implying such control.”

And this is why all the groups are very clear about how they define themselves. Size would appear to have a bearing on this. In the top 15 groups, all – bar three – class themselves as a network, as set out in the EU’s 8th company directive and the International Federation of Accountants’ (IFAC) own ethical code.

But, after that, the picture changes. Out of the remaining 15 groups in the Top 30, only four describe themselves as a network, with the others preferring to take the association route. This is understandable as there can be little doubt that greater resources are required in order to police a network and ensure that there is no exposure to legal action.

“Some international groupings that rather sat on the fence in the ‘network or association’ debate a year or two back are now beginning to take clearer positions about which path they wish to take, and this is causing certain member firms to re-evaluate their membership,” comments James Mendelssohn, chief executive of MSI Global Alliance (20th, $1.3bn).

“This will result in a certain amount of movement of member firms between different organisations – and those with a clear and defined strategy will do well. MSI Global Alliance sees this as an opportunity and, indeed, one that has already resulted in us gaining a couple of new members,” he says.

The group itself expanded into six new countries over the last 12 months, a trend it expects to maintain. However, the association option is not a soft one. As Mendelssohn says: “We continue to extend the association only when a firm is able to meet exacting membership criteria that include full service capability, independent and medium sized, a diverse and growing client base, strong local focus and international experience, and the ability to work in English.”

And he adds that the association is seeing a steady stream of enquiries from firms for whom network membership is no longer desirable.

GMN International (just outside the top 30 with $250m) picks up this theme. “All networks will need to review their operating structure to see if it is proving optimal results for members,” it says.

However, this hasn’t put off some organisations moving from the association model to a network.
From November 2009, Kreston International (16th, $1.9bn) has adopted a strategy that falls within the IFAC network definition. The introduction of procedures to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements for networks will be completed during 2010, it says.

“The resumption of growth of international business following the recent global economic slowdown will see the resurgence of sustained demand for international networks with the ability to provide seamless and integrated high quality compliance and advisory professional services,” it explains.

And this sums up the optimistic attitude of the groups, with many believing that there will be great opportunities for client service and also to grow through acquisition.

Crowe Horwath (11th, $2.8bn) says: “We believe the global economy will recover and will present middle market opportunities for the specialised consulting services that are keys to our business strategy. In addition to organic revenue growth, we anticipate that our larger member firms will complete strategic merger and acquisitions, which will provide additional revenue growth.”

The flipside to this is that a slower economic recovery could dent such growth ambitions while member firms might be acquired by other organisations. And then there is the fear that continued price competition driven by the largest global networks looking for revenue growth will have an impact on the mid-tier groups.

All this means that 2010 is shaping up to be a very interesting year for the international organisations, with winners and losers likely to emerge in equal measure.

Click here for this year's results in full

Int-network-survey-small

Further reading:

Last year’s survey

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Financial Planning and Performance AnalystCabinet Office-Greater London-Competitive

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.