aop
ad

Richard Ennis

by AccountancyAge.com

11 Nov 2004

Back to the list of award winners

With the fifth highest population density in the country, the London Borough of Lambeth has been one of the most problematic.

Exceptional problems relating to crime, income deprivation and unemployment afflict the borough, whose residents have divergent needs and expectations.

Lambeth is expected to deliver a quality service in hundreds of important areas, ranging from housing to social provision. The borough's finances have to be in sound shape if these objectives are to be achieved.

The 2002/03 budget did not make for happy reading. The borough had failed to provide for £21m of bad debt, street lighting and CCTV cameras were underfunded, and nothing had been done to replace the pension fund hole created by the council taking an eight-year pension holiday from 1986.

In addition, a general fund deficit of £28m was reflected in the 2001/02 accounts, along with long-term debt of £850m. The qualified accounts included seven s11s, expressions of serious district audit concern.

The appointment in March 2003 of a new executive director of finance, Richard Ennis, combined with the recruitment of a motivated team of committed permanent assistant directors of finance, kick-started the transformation of Lambeth's financial health.

Ennis involved staff in preparing an analysis of the department's strengths and weaknesses. The financial management crisis demanded a dynamic service plan to cover a range of issues, including strengthening financial management performance, establishing a medium-term financial strategy and implementing ICT and e-procurement strategies to achieve reductions in IT costs.

Headed by Ennis, the Lambeth finance team has transformed the council's finances. The general fund deficit of £28m has been turned into a credit of £19m. There were no s11s in 2002/03 and Lambeth is confident this year's accounts will have no qualifications.

Lambeth is no longer regarded as a soft touch when it comes to non-payment either, with collection of council tax reaching 89% in 2003/04. Changing the culture of non-payment has been a fundamental element of Lambeth's recovery and key to the financial turnaround.

The 2003/04 accounts were approved on 29 July 2004, one month ahead of the statutory deadline. This was the second year in succession that Lambeth met the statutory deadline.

The government's recognition of Lambeth's improvement is evidenced by the approval of PFI grants to the borough. In January 2004 the government monitoring board noted approvingly that 'Lambeth's finances and financial management are beginning to turn around from a high-risk area to a source of strength'.

The judges agreed, heaping praise on Ennis for the turnaround: 'He has achieved a significant turnaround in the fiscal, operational and structural health of the council. He's developed a focused team committed to delivering results.

He's convinced colleagues to accept change as a positive driver toward achieving overall aims. And he's ensured the financial situation is sustainable by having a medium-term strategy.'

Richard Ennis is very motivated by the desire to make a difference to people's lives. He has successfully risen to the challenge of running and repairing Lambeth's finances, pulling the borough out of one of the biggest financial holes in London.

Visitor comments Add your comment

How to transform financial health

I lived in Lambeth during 2000/2001 and fought a running battle with the incompetence of Lambeth Council in regards to council tax. I moved out in 2001 satisfied I had paid everything I owed.

Now, in 2005, the council have decided out of the blue that I have £600 outstanding. They have no record of the letters or phone calls I made to them regarding council tax while I was living in the borough and have apparently made no attempt to contact me during the interim period. My letters to the council tax department have for the most part gone ignored despite the Lambeth council tax charter which states all letters will be replied to within 10 working days.

I have now received a summons for the "outstanding" amount, and Lambeth Council are clearly unwilling to even reply to my letters about the matter. Apparently if they need money it's enough to pick a figure and tell me to pay up, regardless of what I have to say about it.

So is ripping off ordinary people a legitimate strategy for bringing funds into the borough?

Posted by: Chris Dann, 04 Jul 2005 | 00:00

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities