THE AUTUMN STATEMENT is always very well-trailed.
So much so, that today my inbox was filling up with comment well before George Osborne took to his lectern, and as expected he delivered a statement with more or less no surprises. It took him about 50 minutes to say almost nothing.
Of the few interesting points, a couple - such as the proposals to impose capital gains tax on properties owned by non-UK residents and overseas companies and the taxation of salaried partners - were not fleshed out with any particular detail. Nor is there anything to explain how the suggested £9bn saved through anti-avoidance measures was arrived at.
There is nothing to address the apparent cliff-edge built into the abolition of basic rate employer's national insurance contributions for people under 21, either. This, it seems, represents the only real eyebrow-raiser of the day.
That isn't to say none of those proposals will work, but they have huge potential to add unnecessary complexity to the already-convoluted tax code. Not only that, but without direction and clarity there is serious danger that these seeds of good ideas are unlikely to prosper.
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.