IT'S FAIR TO SAY the BBC made very few friends in accountancy this week after broadcasting a Panorama programme criticising government policy on tax avoidance, casting accountancy as an insidious, underhand influence.
While in equal parts simplistic, cheesy and bizarre - the journalist Richard Bilton spent much of the programme scuttling about the countryside in an old mini, somehow trying to use the scenario as an analogy for the tax system - it did have serious ramifications. As a result of the investigation, Baker Tilly tax partner David Heaton resigned his post on the GAAR panel after being secretly filmed describing tax planning strategies two months prior to taking the role.
Be that as it may, it did little to further the tax debate, and largely served to fortify the stereotype that wealthy individuals and companies will stop at nothing to keep the "chancellor's grubby mitts" off their money. In fairness, Heaton saying that - even in jest - doesn't exactly help matters.
There was no real analysis or context provided - something that is admittedly difficult in a programme of just 30 minutes - and created an impression of us - the man on the street - and them - the corporations and a complicit government.
It is, of course, far more nuanced than that. Tax reliefs are not, as the programme suggests, government-sponsored avoidance schemes. They're there to encourage particular behaviours, such as investment in infrastructure. Many of these man-on-the-street characters will work for some of the accused corporations, which contribute to their pension pots and other investments.
That is not to say it was not without its virtues: the brief interview with Hervé Falciani, who famously stole HSBC data on UK taxpayers holding accounts in Switzerland raised questions on whether the information was used to its full potential. Criticism of the Patent Box playing into large businesses' hands was dealt with in a more balanced manner. Small businesses simply cannot afford to devote time and resources to patents, Panorama was told.
But in its response to the programme, the ICAEW reiterated that accountancy is under more scrutiny than ever, and members are under an imperative to maintain high ethical standards.
True, but perhaps the tax community ought to be given a greater voice - an opportunity to defend itself - in programmes such as this in the future. It can't hurt, can it?
Calum Fuller is the tax correspondent for Accountancy Age and Financial Director
...and I thought the BBC was meant to display a balanced view!
However on a more serious note, I think this shows the 'man on the streets' view. Maybe it does reinforce the stereotype and if so then Panorama should do a better job - hey I feel a sequel coming on!
Posted by: jonathan vowles, 19 Sep 2013 | 09:11
Tax makes most people's eyes glaze over. Panorama needs to enthuse as well as inform its audience.
Recent scandals have only served to highlight how the system allows corporations to avoid tax.
The job of tax advisors is to minimise their clients' tax exposure.
HMRC should be challenging absurd transfer pricing arrangements. Journalists rarely expose the real issues because they aren't experts and their audience aren't experts. It's a case of "don't shoot the messenger".
Posted by: Christopher mcNamara, 19 Sep 2013 | 09:40
Not unusual I'm afraid. I have lost count of how many times the BBC has talked about turnover rather than profit when discussing Corporation Tax!
Posted by: Mark Worsnop, 19 Sep 2013 | 10:48
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.