SO WHO’S UP IN ARMS against Starbucks’ tax strategy?
Mainly tax advisors have been against the furore, claiming that – in general – such dealings that Starbucks had are pretty much par for the course, above board, previously scrutinised by tax authorities, while arguing that talking about turnover and corporation tax in the same breath is conflation.
There have been exceptions: TS was unsurprised to see Richard Murphy take umbrage.
But we haven’t seen the institutes step out on this one – think back to the ICAEW’s ‘guidance’ to advisors on ‘helping clients avoid tax‘ earlier this year.
So TS noted with interest that the Association of Accounting Technician’s director of professional development, Adam Harper, quoted in The Guardian’s letters page, to the effect that the coffee chain ‘sidelines’ the UK tax system despite priding itself on ethical standards.
Strong words Adam – not necessarily the views of your employer? Would be interesting to know the direction the AAT’s taking with its exams. Maybe its introduction of an ethics microsite provides the answer…
CIot urges HMRC to consider a delay to the 1 September 2017 introduction of its new corporate offence of failure to prevent the criminal facilitation of tax evasion
The current business rates system is over-complex and reform is needed, but reforms should focus first of all on simplifying the appeals process, particularly for businesses which are subject to business rates exemption
The CIoT has called on the government to rethink its approach to ensuring online sellers pay the correct amount of VAT.
Jane Ellison to serve as 'tax minister' following ministerial responsibilities for public health. David Gauke become chief secretary to the Treasury