09 Jun 2011
LAST NIGHT saw an accountancy event to unite the great and the good, hosted by ICAS at Stationers' Hall.
The annual Aileen Beattie Memorial Lecture was given by Philip Johnson, president of the Federation of European Accountants, and entitled 'The accountancy profession: reinvent or face extinction'.
Fighting words indeed, and the speaker promised to ruffle a few feathers by the end of his one-hour speech.
He ran through the current hot list of ways to shake up the industry: joint audit; mandatory rotation; integrated reporting. One academic accused him of bringing old ideas to the table, but as a Big Four partner later commented, if even two-thirds of the proposals were implemented, the repercussions would be huge.
Johnson placed the burden of change at the feet of firms and institutes, warning legislation could be foisted upon them if solutions are not proactively offered. This, he claimed, would be well received by legislators lacking expertise in the field.
The alternative, faced with a fragmented industry and 27 member states to consider, would be intervention by authorities who are fed up with waiting for business-led change.
He accused audit of failing to keep up with the globalisation of business, saying firms are scrabbling to deliver in an increasingly supranational world.
Johnson pushed for more integrated reporting and assurance for the front half of financial reports, saying investors pay greater attention to investor reports and KPI indicators than the annual offerings of auditors.
But he ended on a positive note, saying reinvention - not extinction - was surely the future of the industry. Close questioning followed on the shape of assurance reports and the implications of a higher audit threshold, among other things.
Deloitte's audit king Martyn Jones laid into Johnson with vigour, after proudly flagging up his recent appointment as vice-president of the ICAEW. He delivered a fiendishly long question in a faux-humble manner, suggesting "the point may have been covered while I was not concentrating". Half answering the query himself, he gave the impression of being little impressed with the speaker's words.
But the evening didn't end on this uncomfortable note, as cocktails and conversation awaited attendees after the question and answer session. All in all, a successful event that keenly piqued the interest of stakeholders struggling to adapt in an industry with an uncertain future.
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
Arbitrage
The president of the Federation of European Accountants suggests that national governments would welcome changes proposed by the profession.
Indeed governments might welcome proposals, but they are unlikely to adopt them. Despite the global economy nearly collapsing and the loss of $trillions, governments still hold onto the final say in what 'independent' external auditors report. The profession's umbrella body, the International Federation of Accountants, has long been unable to address this disastrous flaw in the world's financial safeguards. See http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/2074364/scotland-review-feasibility-tartan-tax
Posted by: slightly optimistic, 10 Jun 2011 | 13:34