28 Apr 2006
I'm not even going to attempt to join in the debate on tax evasion and avoidance currently taking place on the TS blog.
But I can offer the following. Anyone interested in reading more about Murphy, his website is of interest. At the risk of alienating those who complain about my fellow AA blogger and I only referencing Accountancy Age stories, here's a piece we wrote on him.
Teather's book can be downloaded as a pdf here.
And one question to everyone involved in this debate. It's time the tax profession came up with a credible defence of some of the more extreme things it does. Is Teather's approach the right one? Are advisers going to continue taking a passive approach to the question of tax havens, abusive avoidance and even evasion (I've never met a tax avoider. At least, most advisers I meet profess, unconvincingly, to having nothing personally to do with it)?
One lighter question. Who at ACCA is going to chair this debate on June 6th?
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment
Alex - if you can get Damian to authorise the Easyjet return fare to|Alicante, I can introduce you to any number of people who are/have avoided tax. British, German and Dutch and of course Spanish. How many do you need for a good story given that you won't get their proper name but - hey who said you could have it all? Bonus: I'll lob in some of the best tapas you'll find in Spain. And no - I ain't one - been a legit French resident for many years, transitioning to Spanish residence. And no hidden cameras :)
In the early 90s I was active in creating tax avoidance schemes in conjunction with the then Arthur Anderson. In those days, there was a tacit acceptance - get the steps right, ensure commercial reality and you're pretty much there. Today's a lot different. I've written about that at my place.
To the more substantive point. When you have KPMG slapped with a $456 million fine for selling illegal tax schemes, asking for time to pay when it took in $15.6 BILLION in fees last year, gleefully trumpeting much of the rise was compliance related then there is something not quite right.
The problem comes in 4 complementary flavours - tutti frutti style:
1. A state of war between pros and HMRC - look at HMRC triumphalism at M&S/Halifax and the dogged pursuit of crazy interpretations like Arctic Systems - see also Nichola Ross Martin (for Arctic litigants) - triumphal too.
2. A government politically motivated to tinker through stealth taxes and ill-advised tweaks rather than radical and unequivocal change that reflects today's economic need.
3. A highly developed avoidance profession tuned in to any weakness in legislation
4. Murphy's tax gap report that none of the Big Four has managed to explain away to anyone's satisfaction.
Posted by: Dennis Howlett, 28 Apr 2006 | 21:35
Very good of you to admit to your tax avoiding past, Dennis. Did you really never get involved in any 'schemes'? The thirty step, tax loss, paperwork only-type tax planning? I'm thinking it would be good to have a running column here about that sort of thing. The Independent runs a 'my worst mistake' column for journalists. I think a 'my most embarrassing tax scheme' column would be good for tax advisers.
Obviously there'd be a few problems with that, but if anyone wants to post anonymously...
Posted by: Alex Hawkes, 03 May 2006 | 15:28
Alex
It would be good if the profession could explain why avoidance is acceptable
It would be even better if they would follow the rules of professional ethics and fund research to show why it is contrary to professional standards of conduct
Any takers?
Richard
Posted by: Richard Murphy, 10 May 2006 | 13:59
Been off the radar for a while. Tsk, tsk Alex, I'll not be tempted into treading on that particular banana skin and am not one of those who hidews behind anonymity.
Remember I'm going back 13-15 years, when buying gold bars for a day, container leases and any other number of exotic wheezes were considered perfectly acceptable and legitimate fare at year end. And that's before we look at corporate structures involving offshore trusts pre-incorporation, pre-contract etc etc when those types of arrangement were never challenged but accepted as within the law.
Today, it seems any form of tax mitigation is regarded as a no-no. The whole thing is getting out of hand. On both sides.
Posted by: Dennis Howlett, 23 May 2006 | 02:05
I'm not sure that I understand this. I might actually need some assistance.
Posted by: casino, 21 Apr 2010 | 13:44
The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that it has never tried to contact us.--Bill Watterson, U.S. cartoonist, "Calvin and Hobbes"
Posted by: Emmett Kohnen, 10 Aug 2010 | 15:45
Wow thank god i found a page like this. I've actually been searching for a few weeks for something that can help me in my school report - im glad you came up on that point that i needed to write about - thank you
Posted by: website marketing, 25 Aug 2010 | 21:00
Another one bites the dust...
Posted by: Jeane Knippel, 17 Sep 2010 | 02:22
Well, I was thinking maybe you'd like to see these nifty things at www.camerapenuk.co.uk - camera pen gizmos which are available in the UK. I have also seen the same technology in watches aswell - i'll post the url if I can locate it. I think the camera pen is rightly my favourite
Posted by: camera pen movies, 08 Oct 2010 | 12:40
How-do-you-do, just needed you to know I have added your site to my Google bookmarks because of your extraordinary blog layout. But seriously, I think your site has one of the freshest theme I've came across. It really helps make reading your blog a lot easier.
Posted by: Online Consignment, 09 Oct 2010 | 16:09