Wealth Tax: What the papers say

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

30 Aug 2012

  • Comments

DISCUSSION about Nick Clegg's proposed ‘wealth tax' has filled many column inches this morning.

It would appear that battle lines are being drawn between the Tories and Lib-Dems over the deputy prime minister's call for a heavier tax burden on the rich through some temporary mechanism.

The Guardian and Telegraph report that the chancellor has reacted ‘coolly' to Clegg's latest words.

The government "mustn't drive away the wealth creators and the businesses that are going to lead our economic recovery", Osborne said during a visit to Sunderland yesterday.

Other reports cite Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin's word on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, where he said "if the politics of envy made a country rich, we'd be very rich", warning that further taxes on the wealthy would drive them abroad.

Shadow Treasury minister Chris Leslie pointed out that Clegg had voted for the government's top-rate tax reduction in the last Budget.

Some experts, including London School of Economics professor John Kay, are concerned that introducing a levy on people's wealth would be impossible to administer.

A Conservative source told the Telegraph that the tax systems were still coping with changes to cut child benefit from higher-rate taxpayers.

The FT's editorial column argues that increasing total tax revenues would be a "perhaps mortal" blow to growth. However, as part of a system of freeing the burden on employer and employee taxes, an annual tax on the wealthy could work. It wants the revenues raised to fund cuts in NI – a tax that the FT says discourages hiring.

"An annual tax on very large fortunes would scarcely hurt demand, while a lighter burden on work, or indeed income, could stimulate it," the FT said.

The Independent's editorial said the idea "should not be dismissed" as "cynical politicking". While income tax will always be avoidable, taxing assets is much harder to duck.

"Sympathy for the stereotypical widow – asset-rich, but cash poor, intent on living in her multimillion-pound pile until her dying day – can only go so far. The chancellor rejected a mansion tax at the last Budget, but it seems to have been a close thing. Perhaps the harsh reality of the reduced tax take could persuade him to change his mind," it said.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send


Financial Planner

The Ministry of Defence Surgeon General’s (SG) Finance Department, Lichfield, Staffordshire, Permanent, Full Time, £ £30,008




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.