The original vision of The National Programme for IT (NPfIT) is still
achievable despite serious delays to some parts of the scheme, according to a
report by the National
Audit Office (NAO) released today.
The N3 broadband network and data spine,
which together form the infrastructure of the programme, have been deployed on
schedule while the Choose and Book
appointment booking service, a
PACS digital x-ray
scheme and an electronic prescription service have also hit deadlines.
But the Summary Care Records scheme – one of the largest parts of the
programme – is seriously delayed and is unlikely to be deployed before 2014,
four years later than originally planned.
This should become a priority for
Connecting for Health – the
agency which runs the scheme - according to Tim Burr, head of the NAO.
"The scale of the challenge involved in delivering the NPfIT has proved to be
far greater than envisaged at the start, with serious delays in delivering the
new care records systems," he said.
"The priority now is to finish developing and deploying these systems."
Planned 'go live' dates were missed for many of the first trusts to take the
new care records systems.
Delays with the Lorenzo patient
software from supplier iSoft – to be used in the North, Midlands and East –
are causing particular problems, while there have also been problems with
Cerner's
Millennium
patient software.
Software development is taking much longer than originally planned, with the
first release now expected to be available for deployment at three early-adopter
trusts this summer.
In the interim, local service providers have upgraded an existing care
records system to fill the gap and the scheme has also been hampered by security
concerns.
Strategic Health Authorities are conducting a detailed review of all aspects
of data security across their parts of the NHS.
A recent independent report on the Summary Care Records system by University
College London recommended that the consent model be changed, and Connecting for
Health is considering this possibility, a move welcomed by the British Medical
Association.
"There is much to be done to inform the public about electronic patient
records. The adoption of a consent-to-view system could go some way to improving
the public awareness of electronic patient records," said Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GP
negotiator with responsibility for IT in the
BMA.
A consent-to-view model would mean patients give consent for their medical
records to be viewed on a case-by-case basis rather than giving blanket
authorisation – a system already used in Wales.
The programme has also had problems informing staff as well as patients and
problems with clinical engagement have led to many staff being wary of new
systems.
The report found that in the past two years Connecting for Health has taken
steps to strengthen its mechanisms for clinical engagement, including appointing
a chief clinical officer to enhance clinical leadership of the programme, but
there is still progress to be made before all staff are on side.
Edward Leigh MP, chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, said
commitment from NHS staff is central to the success of the scheme.
"Much more work needs to be done in convincing NHS staff of the benefits that
should arise from a fully functioning system," he said.
The Department of Health said it regrets
that the care records service is taking longer than was expected.
"We have said before that this is because of a mixture of technical
complexity and to allow further time for consultation and the development of the
Care
Record Guarantee, to meet the concerns that patients may otherwise have felt
about the confidentiality of their records," it said in a statement.
The report also found that the NPfIT's costs have risen from £12.4bn to
£12.7bn, mainly because of contract resets.
Comments
Have your say on this article