Crucial rules review delayed over staff inadequacies

An IASB report made candid admissions about how the project to overhaul current off-balance sheet rules lost momentum because of staff turnover and 'relative inexperience'

Written by Penny Sukhraj

Inexperience and staff turnover at the international standard setter have been cited as reasons for the derailing a project to overhaul problematic off-balance-sheet rules.

The rules, attacked recently for allowing risky structures to be kept off the books of lenders, have been described by the International Accounting Standards board as 'irretrievably broken', the FT reported.

However an IASB report made candid admissions about how the project to overhaul current off-balance sheet rules lost momentum because of staff turnover and 'relative inexperience'.

It also recommended the urgent appointment of a senior figure to take charge of the project.

'We cannot afford the luxury of waiting for the newly assigned staff to get up to speed,' the report said.

The report further admitted that an overhaul of the rules would not be possible in the near future.

Further reading:

King to get tough on banks' balance sheets

G7 pushes for greater disclosure of banks' losses

Watchdog urged to probe off-balance sheet

Enjoyed this article? Help spread the word:

Comments

Reader comments for this story

White papers

Related jobs

Spotlight

Accountants and the crisis: the outlook - ready for the worst

The downturn is hurting and forecasts of recession hang heavy...

PwC 10-year anniversary special report

Relive how the controversial mega-merger of Price Waterhouse and Coopers...

Make partner fast with YP

The latest edition of Young Professional features our definitive guide...

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Search white papers

Search white papers

Have your say

Fair value accounting has attracted a lot of criticism, but is it actually fair?
Yes, it's better than any other method available.
No, it's caused too much trouble. Get rid.
It's promising but could work better with modifications.

Job of the week

More finance jobs...

Your next job