British Territories in trouble over annual reports

The annual reporting stumbling blocks of British far-flung outposts are a cause for concern

Written by David Jetuah

It might raise a few eyebrows to learn that the last time the Cayman Islands submitted an annual report was in 2003. With that in mind, it may be more concerning to find that the National Audit Office says that this is one of the better performing British Territories in terms of robust regulatory frameworks.

The current situation looks dire: from the evidence on the table, delivering punctual audit reports and keeping government departments in check is by no means easy in the tropical idylls.

Advertisement

In the ten years since the last study was launched into the territories’ public sector watchdogs, accounts committees in many of these places still struggle to provide effective, apolitical and timely scrutiny of the executive, the NAO has said.

With the exception of The Falklands and The Pitcairns, none of the 11 territories which have permanent populations submitted their last set of figures more recently than December 2005. The Caymans are something of a special case because the Public Accounts Committee has to sign off on their numbers, but it took until November 2006 for the accounts to be released by the PAC.

An acute shortage of capacity in bookkeeping and basic accounting skills, coupled with ‘inertia or complacency on the part of responsible officials’ has made the situation even worse in some areas.

The Acting Auditor General of the British Virgin Islands estimated her staffing levels were one third below what they needed to be.

The accounts for 2006 were still being audited at the time of the NAO’s study. Despite its 2005 audit going to the relevant authorities, the 2004 study was still waiting to be signed off, admittedly due to Hurricane Ivan.

Of the 11 territories monitored by the foreign office, Bermuda, The Caymans, the British Virgin Islands, Gibraltar, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Anguilla and Montserrat are highlighted by the NAO as being globally important offshore financial centres, but the aforementioned lack of capacity has some serious knock-on effects.

‘The capacity limitations in the offshore financial sector have stunted the Territories’ ability to investigate suspicious activity reports,’ the NAO said. So attempts to stamp out money laundering, which, whether they like it or not, is more associated with offshore centres, is being hampered by the territories’ lack of accounting expertise.

Foreign office chiefs have been urged by the NAO to work alongside the Treasury, the FSA and the Serious Organised Crime Agency to beef up regulatory standards. It looks like it can’t happen too soon.

Tags:

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

More Accounting jobs

Spotlight

Ted Bell, Abel and Cole FD

Profile: Ted Bell, FD of Abel and Cole

The combination of the online shopping boom and a hunger...

Top 30 Accounting Networks and Associations 2008

The race to become the biggest firm on the planet...

Barack Obama Accountancy Age cover October 2008

Obama: asset or liability?

What an Obama presidency could mean for you

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Job of the week

More finance jobs

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Your next job

Have your say

Will proposed tax cuts help to stimulate the economy?
Yes
No

Advertisement

Search white papers

Search white papers

Advertisement