Non-doms are good for the UK

It may seem unfair, but non-doms benefit the UK economy

Written by Mike Warburton

It’s easy to make the argument that the tax treatment of non-domiciled UK residents is unfair. Why should two people living next door to each other in similar circumstances pay different amounts of tax, simply through an accident of birth? In my view, this fairness argument is simplistic. In truth, life is unfair, in that an accident of birth can help or hinder each one of us.

The key issue is whether the nation as a whole benefits from the rules. This was put clearly in the 2003 background paper from the Treasury, where the issues of fairness and competitiveness were contrasted.

Advertisement

In recent years, London has become the financial capital of the world. This is partly due to over-reaction by the US to the Enron scandal, but due, at least in part, to the welcome we have given in the UK to those who wish to bring their enterprise, talent and money to the UK.

International businessmen and women do not have to come here ­ there are plenty of other countries that would welcome their contribution. Whether or not they pay tax in the UK, the impact they make on business and employment is vast. We meddle with this at our peril.

Even if we were to change the rules, I do not accept that it would raise any appreciable amounts of additional tax. Firstly, of course, some individuals may depart our shores and others will be discouraged from coming. Apart from that, any non-doms here with wealth are likely to have it invested through existing offshore structures so that, even if the rules were changed, the Treasury would be likely to find collecting any tax rather like grasping for a wet bar of soap.

Over the past 30 years I recall many occasions when the non-domicile rules have been questioned and on each occasion, after due reflection, the government of the day has decided against making any change.

In the early 1990s the Conservative government dropped the proposals after strong lobbying by the Greek shipping industry and, it is believed, some personal pressure from Margaret Thatcher. If that is true, she did so with good reason.

As a Brit I cannot benefit directly from these rules, but I would be aghast if the government was rash enough to make a change. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Mike Warburton is senior tax partner at Grant Thornton

Tags:

Comments

White papers

Related jobs

More Accounting jobs

Spotlight

Andrew Higginson, Tesco Personal Finance

Profile: Andrew Higginson, CEO of Tesco Personal Finance

He’s spent more than a decade at the top of...

Top 30 Accounting Networks and Associations 2008

The race to become the biggest firm on the planet...

Barack Obama Accountancy Age cover October 2008

Obama: asset or liability?

What an Obama presidency could mean for you

Find your next job

Find your next job
Salary Checker

Job of the week

More finance jobs

Newsletters

Sign up here for the very latest news delivered to your inbox. Choose from the following options:

Your next job

Have your say

Will proposed tax cuts help to stimulate the economy?
Yes
No

Advertisement

Search white papers

Search white papers

Advertisement